Funding
Subaward activities may begin earlier than the actual fully executed contract date, but no earlier than July 1, 2026, or may be delayed by institutional processing times for the related documentation and contracts.
Description of Award
The goal of the Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) is to advance the progress of medicine and improve public health by providing U.S. health professionals with equal access to biomedical information and improving individuals' access to information to enable them to make informed decisions about their health.
The NNLM Regional Medical Libraries (RMLs) and Offices rely upon partnerships. The award’s primary aims are to widen access to and awareness of health information resources, with a focus on those resources provided by the NLM. The programs are intended to help a variety of users:
- Make the most effective use of information and decision-support resources to promote healthy behaviors
- Prevent costly and debilitating illness
- Improve health outcomes when disease occurs
The purpose of the Health Information Outreach Award is to ensure that healthcare professionals, patients, and the public are introduced to authoritative health information. This award provides support for projects that improve health information literacy and increase the ability of consumers, caregivers, students, and other members of the public to find and use health information.
Funds can also be used to improve healthcare professionals’ access to, awareness of, and skills for locating high-quality biomedical and health information. Awards should focus on building partnerships, collaborating with local community groups, and other stakeholders to provide health information outreach projects to the region.
- All projects must incorporate one or more National Library of Medicine resources like PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, or MedlinePlus. Explore product guides for select NLM resources. It is recommended that you incorporate NNLM programs and resources when possible. Consult your local RML for more assistance.
Potential projects may include, but are not limited to:
- Promoting awareness and use of health information resources and data by developing, delivering, and evaluating educational programs or resources for health and public health professionals, information professionals, or the public
- Improving access to health information and technology
- Exhibiting or presenting at local meetings or organizational events to share completed outreach projects and promote NLM products and services
- Evaluating health information and training needs of a community and implementing a training plan for that audience
- Development of supplemental educational materials using NLM resources
- Train-the-trainer projects that enhance the skills of service-providing staff and other consumer health information intermediaries to train participants in how to locate and evaluate health information
RML/Office staff are available for consultation on applicable NLM resources. Learn more about past funded projects on the NNLM Past Funded Projects webpage.
- Your institution/organization must be a Network Member of the NNLM. Not a member yet? Join now for free!
- Organizations, in most cases, are only eligible to apply for awards from the Regional Medical Library (RML) that serves their state. Please contact the RML for further clarification.
University of North Texas Health Science Center-RCOI Requirement
Successful applicants will be required to submit a Research Conflict of Interest (RCOI) disclosure as described on the university website.
“All individuals, both internal and external, involved in research are required to complete the new UNTHSC COI eDisclosure. For external individuals, please email compliance@unthsc.edu the following information: name of individual, email address, department at UNTHSC they will be affiliated with (Gibson D. Lewis Library, NNLM Region 3), and state they are an external individual. An account will be created for completion of the UNTHSC RCOI eDisclosure.”
For more information, visit: https://www.unthealth.edu/research/office-of-research-compliance/research-conflict-of-interest/index.html
Disallowance of Human Subjects Research
Projects containing Human Subjects Research components will not be reviewed or considered for funding for this award. Typically, quality improvement activities are not considered human subjects research and would be eligible to apply for funding.
Applicants should provide a determination letter from their Institutional Review Board (IRB) stating that their project does not meet regulatory definitions (i.e. a Non-Human Subjects research determination), if applying from institutions with an IRB. The non-HSR documentation can be submitted with the award proposal materials, or as soon as possible.
Application Instructions
Your application should include the following items:
- Full Project Proposal (3 Sections: Project Information, Project Narrative, Budget Justification with both Narrative and Spreadsheet)
- CVs/Resumes for Personnel
- SF424 R&R Budget Sheet
- F&A rate agreement (varies by institution, and if applicable)
- IRB determination letter (if applicable)
- Letters of support (optional)
Please do not combine all six (6) items into a single PDF package. Send as six separate attachments in a single email. Detailed instructions for each item are below.
Item 1: FULL PROJECT PROPOSAL
Please include the following three sections (Project Information, Project Narrative, and Budget Justification with both Narrative and Spreadsheet) in your Full Project Proposal. Follow the page limits and formatting standards below to ensure readability and fairness.
- Text size: 12-point font
- Text color: Black
- Recommended fonts:
- Arial,
- Georgia,
- Helvetica, or
- Times New Roman
- 1” margins
- DOCX or PDF file format is acceptable
- Clearly formatted headings and labels for each section of your application
A. Project Information Section (do not exceed 1 page)
- Lead Organization: List the institution that will lead and receive funding to conduct the proposed project.
- Project Lead: Enter the name of the person coordinating this project.
- Institution Tax ID: Enter the 9-digit tax identification number for your institution.
- Institution UEI Number: Please confirm your organization’s Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). As of April 2022, the Federal Government has transitioned from use of the DUNS Number to the UEI as the primary means of entity identification for federal awards. If your organization is currently registered in SAM.gov with either an active or inactive registration, you have already been assigned a UEI. If your organization does not have a UEI, apply for one as soon as possible.
- Have you/your institution previously received NNLM funding in the current grant cycle? Select “Yes,” “No,” or “I don’t know.”
- Amount Requested: The amount specified should not exceed the limit established by the RML/Office and communicated in this Request for Applications. Contact your RML/Office if you have questions about the funding amount.
B. Project Narrative Section (do not exceed 10 pages; Note: the 10-page limit does not include supporting documentation such as a bibliography or appendix)
- Project Title: Describe the project with an external audience in mind.
- Project Summary: Provide a one-paragraph description that summarizes the proposed project. Funded projects are displayed on the NNLM website and are provided by NLM in response to requests from NIH, HHS, OMB, Congress, and the White House.
- Partner Organizations: If applicable, use the NNLM Network Directory to find existing records for up to three (3) organizations that will partner with the Lead Organization to conduct/complete the project. List them here. Note: If a record does not exist for a partner organization, provide the institution's name, address, and contact information.
- Training to be Provided as Part of this Award: State "Yes,” or “No”
- Proposed Start and End Dates for the Project: List the appropriate dates. Please refer to the dates listed for the period of performance to guide your consideration. Contact your RML/Office before applying if your project is anticipated to extend more than one year.
- Evidence of Need: Provide a statement of how the project proposed will support the mission of NNLM, explain how this project will address community needs, and describe the reach of this project. When possible, support the stated need using data such as known needs assessments or statistics.
- Project goals and objectives: State the goal(s) and specific objectives(s) of the proposed project. Project goals should align with NNLM Initiatives and Priorities. These initiatives and priorities are intended to further NLM goals and objectives.
- Implementation: Describe what will be done to meet project objectives and its rationale. Include tasks to be performed and who will perform them.
- Schedule/Timeline: Include a timeline for implementing the plan to meet objectives.
- Evaluation Plan (PAS-SUB option): Funded projects are strongly encouraged to use the Subaward Participant Activity Survey (PAS-SUB), which is available through the NNLM National Evaluation Center Materials. The purpose of the PAS-SUB is to evaluate subaward-funded activities in a rigorous and standard manner, and can serve as the sole evaluation tool for funded projects. This instrument is available for awardees’ use with their projects in both English and Spanish.
- Evaluation Plan (non-PAS-SUB option): For proposals not utilizing the PAS-SUB, describe how the project will be evaluated. Include data collection frequency, type of data to be collected, tools, how data will be used or disseminated, and justification for not using the PAS-SUB.
- Note: Subawardees can choose to use the PAS-SUB as part of their own existing evaluation, but they must use all questions in the PAS-SUB verbatim and in the order provided. PAS-SUB questions have been determined by the Northwestern University IRB to be non-Human Subjects research and subsequently approved by NLM Extramural Programs. Additional or alternative evaluation instruments would need a local IRB determination letter. Please consult with your RML for assistance with evaluation questions.
- Publicity/Promotion: Briefly describe how you intend to promote your project to the target audience. Please specify which NLM resources or NNLM national initiatives will be utilized, how they will be promoted, and how they will be utilized throughout the project.
- Continuity/Sustainability Plan: Describe the activities that will sustain project services and/or communication to the targeted community beyond the award project period.
- Personnel Qualifications: If applicable, list the project personnel who will be involved in the project and include their role(s) and applicable experience. Submit resumes or CVs for personnel listed in the proposal.
C. Budget Justification Narrative and Spreadsheet (do not exceed 5 pages)
Awards are cost-reimbursable and are issued to the institution, not the individual. For each budgeted category and line item, include a justification for the purchase that explains its purpose for the project (written narrative) and a cost breakdown explanation of the calculation of costs, GSA rates, vendor selection details, etc. (spreadsheet).
If a budget line or category is not applicable to your project, you may leave it blank.
The budget estimate should be categorized by the following, as they apply:
- Personnel: Include breakdown of calculations (% time X annual salary) or (hourly rate X estimated hours). Check with your RML/Office for specifics on personnel.
- Consultant Costs: Estimate expenses from consultants, such as marketing firms or other agencies. Submit the following information to the RML/Office: name of consultant, description of work, hourly rate, total amount/not to exceed amount, and period of performance.
- Equipment: Quotes for items required to complete the project, such as computers and other equipment. Include quotes received or other pricing information as a separate attachment.
- Supplies: Quotes for printing and other materials. Include a written narrative description, spreadsheet calculation explanations, and add quotes received from vendors/providers as a separate attachment.
- Communications: Media, publicity, or other communication costs. Include written description, spreadsheet calculation explanations, and vendor/provider quotes as a separate attachment.
- Reproduction: Printing materials or other reproduction costs.
- Travel: Estimates for travel. Include a written narrative description, spreadsheet calculation explanations, and vendor/provider quotes as a separate attachment.
- Other: Include description, budget calculation explanation, and any quotes as a separate attachment.
- Indirect Costs (IDC) or Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs: Apply at your institution’s non-research rate (typically “Other Sponsored Research”). If your institution has no negotiated rate, a 10% Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) can be applied if you wish to claim it. Note: If Indirect Costs (IDC) are included in your overall budget, your Direct Costs plus your IDC should not exceed the total award amount.
- Important Note on Funding Restrictions: Food, promotional items, and furniture are not allowable expenses. Promotional items include, but are not limited to: Clothing and commemorative items such as pens, mugs/cups, folders/folios, lanyards, and conference bags that are sometimes provided to visitors, employees, grantees, or conference attendees. Refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Item 2: PERSONNEL CVs/RESUMES
Please include the CVs or resumes of any key personnel or contributors to the project.
Item 3: SF424 R&R BUDGET SHEET
Please complete the accompanying SF424 R&R Budget Sheet. Detailed instructions on completing this form can be found on page 92 of General Instructions for NIH and other PHS Agencies.
Item 4: F&A RATE AGREEMENT (if applicable)
If your institution has a negotiated F&A rate, your Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) or equivalent department can provide you with a copy of the current rate agreement.
If your organization does not have a negotiated F&A rate and chooses to receive the “de minimus” or Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) calculation of the rate of 10%, no documentation is needed.
Item 5: IRB NON-HUMAN SUBJECTS DETERMINATION LETTER (if applicable)
The RML does not fund projects that involve human subjects research. Some organizations have an Institutional Review Board will evaluate your project and generate a determination letter indicating that your project does not meet regulatory definitions. Inquire within your organization if you’re unsure about how to obtain this letter.
If selected for this award, the RML will submit your proposal to the North Texas Regional Institutional Review Board for review if a letter is not available from your organization. Consulting with the RML prior to submitting your application is highly recommended.
Item 6: LETTERS OF SUPPORT OR COMMITMENT (optional)
If you are partnering with another organization that is contributing effort or resources to your project, you may include any letters that demonstrate that commitment. This is optional.
When you submit application documents, you are agreeing to the following:
- You will share the information gained with colleagues in your institution/RML/Office, as required by this Request for Applications.
- You will submit regular, interim, and final reports, including Activity Reports in CiviCRM, as requested by the funding agency and stipulated in the Request for Applications.
- Any web-based resources developed for this project will ensure accessibility to the greatest possible number of people.
- Additional documentation will need to be completed in the event your project is awarded. Please consult your RML/Office for details.
The full application package with the six items detailed above should be emailed to: nnlmregion3@unthsc.edu.
If you do not receive an email confirming your submission within one (1) business day, please email Executive Director, Michele Whitehead at Michele.Whitehead@unthealth.edu.
Additional Information
Digital Accessibility @ HHS
Section 508 requires that all website content be accessible to people with disabilities. This applies to Web applications, Web pages and all attached files on the intranet, as well as, internet. The National Library of Medicine is a part of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Recipients of National Library of Medicine funding through the NNLM must meet all requirements under Section 508. Information on Digital Accessibility at HHS.
Technical/progress reports on the project may be required to satisfy its reporting obligations to the Federal Awarding Agency.
A Final Report will be submitted within 15 days after the end of the Project Period, or 30 days after termination of this award, whichever comes first.
Reporting Requirement | Access | Timeline |
Activities and Participants –Submitted through the NNLM Data Reporting System (DRS) | Subawardees must add reports on their individual project page which is accessible via the institutional record.
An assigned coordinator will provide training and assistance on using the DRS. | Within 10 days of the activity. |
Participant Activity Survey for Subawardees (PAS-SUB) | An assigned coordinator will support access to the PAS-SUB.
Additional information about the PAS-SUB is available: https://www.nnlm.gov/nec/evalmaterials | Two weeks lead time is required for this process. |
Final Report –Submitted through the NNLM DRS | Same as above. | Within 30 days of project completion or 15 days after the end of the Project Period. |
Required if Applicable | ||
If technology is purchased or provided: NNLM Technology Report |
Additional information about this reporting requirement is available: https://www.nnlm.gov/nec/evalmaterials | Submit before the final report |
If funds are included for professional development: NNLM Professional Development Report | NNLM Professional Development Award Report
Additional information about this reporting requirement is available: https://www.nnlm.gov/nec/evalmaterials
| Within 30 days after the last day completed |
Recipients of NNLM funding are required to deposit any peer-reviewed manuscript upon acceptance for publication in PubMed Central in accordance with the NIH Public Access Policy.
To facilitate the dissemination of knowledge and information associated with the NNLM Cooperative Agreement Award, all subawardees are required to share any data or training material resulting from funding. For more information, please contact NNLM Region 3.
In addition, recipients of funding are expected to use or adapt existing training materials before developing new materials. Consult with your RML/Office and the NNLM Training Office (NTO) prior to developing materials.
Per Section 8.2.1. - Right in Data (Publication and Copyrighting) of the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH must be given a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license for the Federal government to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use any materials developed as a result of funding and to authorize others to do so for Federal purposes, i.e. the ongoing development of the Network of the National Library of Medicine. Data developed by a subawardees/consortium participants and consultants are also subject to this policy.
Any resources developed with project funds must include an acknowledgment of NIH grant support and a disclaimer. Please consult with your RML/Office for the specific acknowledgement statement to be used for your project award.
Application Review and Scoring Criteria
Reviewers are selected by the RML/Office/Center. The Review Committee may include staff as well as Network members from the region, such as public health professionals, academic health science librarians, and community organizations. The Review Committee will make final recommendations for funding to the Executive Director of the RML/Office. Applicants will receive a copy of reviewer comments along with a final funding decision.
Scored Review Criteria: Scale: 1-95
The application will be scored in the following areas:
- Significance (15 points max): Does the proposed program make a significant contribution to the mission of NNLM. Does the application explain the need for the project including information about the community being served and the reach of project? Are there estimates of the potential population and the portion expected to be reached? Is the intended community described and the actual or perceived need for the proposed program discussed?
- Methodology/Approach (40 points max): Does the statement show the logic and feasibility of the technical approach to reaching the community? Are the types of outreach services provided appropriate, creative, and cost-effective? Does the project plan demonstrate sustainability or the ability to provide lessons learned for future programs? Does the proposed project add value to other initiatives? Does the project use local partners? Does the proposal include a timeline or implementation schedule for major events and activities? Does the program specify what NLM resources or NNLM national initiatives will be promoted and how they will be utilized throughout the project?
- Evaluation (15 points max): Is the PAS-SUB being used? If not, is there an evaluation plan? Does the plan make sense given the goals and objectives? Is there a timeline and are individuals assigned responsibility for milestones or tasks? Are there other forms of evaluation that the project should consider or add? Is the plan thorough enough or feasible for the project?
- Project Staff (15 points max): Does the proposed personnel have expertise and/or experience in developing and conducting outreach and/or training programs in health information for patients, the public or healthcare professionals? Do they have prior experience working with this community? Is there evidence of institutional facilities and resources adequate to support the proposed programs. If applicable, do project partners bring experience to the project team?
- Budget and Budget Justification (10 points max): Is the proposed budget within funding limits? Is the budget justification sound? Could budget items be eliminated or reduced without jeopardizing the project? Does it include money within allowable line items? Do they have line items that account for all the requested money? Are both a budget written narrative and completed budget spreadsheet with cost breakdown and calculations included?
- RML/Office staff and Network members will review and score applications using a standardized RFP scorecard.
- Reviewer score sheets and comments will be shared with the applicant. If further clarification is needed, the applicant will be given 1 week to submit more information.
- The RML/Office will provide a subaward agreement for all approved projects. All sub-awards are cost reimbursement. Line item invoices must be submitted for reimbursement of expenditures. Invoices may be sent monthly.
For additional resources, example scorecards, and tips for writing your grant proposal, we have a free NNLM Proposal Writing Toolkit available on our website.