Course Evaluation
Select the course title:
____ Introduction to Consumer Health Resources at the NLM: Basic (1.0 hour)
____ Introduction to Consumer Health Resources at the NLM: Plus (1.5 hours)
____ Introduction to PubMed - Basic (1.0 hour)
____ Introduction to PubMed - Plus (2.0 hours)
____ Introduction to PHpartners.org - Basic (1.0 hour)
____ Introduction to PHpartners.org - Plus (2.0
hours)
Site:
City, State:
Date(s):
Course Objectives
• At the end of the Introduction to Consumer Health Resources at the NLM course, the physician's awareness of MedlinePlus, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed and the NLM Gateway resources will increase; the physician's ability to use these resources with patients will increase.
• At the end of the Introduction to PubMed course, the physician's awareness of the purpose of PubMed, the content of MEDLINE, and PubMed's special features will increase.
• At the end of the Introduction to PHpartners.org course, the physician's awareness of the purpose and contents of PHpartners.org will increase; the physician's ability to use PHpartners.org to support public health practice will increase.
Please complete the following Continuing Medical Education
Questionnaire. To indicate your answers, use the rating scale
that is shown by circling the number that represents your
answer.
| Rating of Objectives | None or Not at all | Very little | Moderately | Considerably | Completely | Not Applicable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. a. I acquired an understanding of the data content in MedlinePlus, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, PHpartners.org, and the Gateway. |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
n/a
|
| 1.b. I learned to formulate a basic search strategy using these resources. |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
n/a
|
| 1.c. I became familiar with special features/functions of these resources. |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
n/a
|
| 2. The overall quality of the instructional process was an asset to the program. |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
n/a
|
| 3. To what extent did participation in this activity enhance your professional effectiveness? |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
n/a |
4. Did you perceive any commercial bias? Use the following criteria to judge:
- The content presented was balanced, evidence-based, demonstrated scientific rigor, and was without commercial bias.
- I was informed about the existence and resolution of relevant financial relationships/conflict of interests of planners and presenters prior to the presentation.
- Speakers who discussed off label, investigational, or alternative uses of products, devices or techniques disclosed this in their presentation.
- Educational materials were free of advertising, trade names or product-group messages.
__ NO
__ YES. If yes, please explain:
5. What comments or suggestions do you have for the faculty presenter(s)?
6. What will you do differently as a result of attending this educational activity?
7. Are there any other speakers or new topics you would like to have covered in this or in a related activity?
8. Do you have additional comments to enhance the utility or impact of the activity?
9. May we have your permission to contact you by e-mail at a later date about the impact this training may have had on your clinical practice?
____ Yes. My e-mail address is:
____ No. Please do not contact me.
THANK YOU!
