Draft Declaration of Data Citation Principles – For Comment
This has been a very interesting and positive collaborative process and has involved a number of groups and committed individuals. Encouraging the practice of data citation, it seems to me, is one of the key steps towards giving research data its proper place in the literature.
As the preamble to the draft principles states:
Sound, reproducible scholarship rests upon a foundation of robust, accessible data. For this to be so in practice as well as theory, data must be accorded due importance in the practice of scholarship and in the enduring scholarly record. In other words, data should be considered legitimate, citable products of research. Data citation, like the citation of other evidence and sources, is good research practice.
In support of this assertion, and to encourage good practice, we offer a set of guiding principles for data citation.
Please do comment on these principles. We hope that with community feedback and support, a finalised set of principles can be widely endorsed and adopted.
Discussion on a variety of lists is welcome, of course. However, *if you want the Synthesis Group to take full account of your views, please be sure to post your comments on the discussion forum <http://www.force11.org/datacitation>.*
Some notes and observations on the background to these principles I would like to add here some notes and observations on the genesis of these principles. As has been widely observed there have been a number of groups and interested parties involved in exploring the principles of data citation for a number of years. Mentioning only some of the sources and events that affected my own thinking on the matter, there was the 2007 Micah Altman and Gary King article, in DLib, which offered ‘A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data’ <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html> and Toby Green’s OECD White Paper ‘We need publishing standards for datasets and data tables’ <http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/603233448430>in 2009. Micah Altman and Mercè Crosas organised a workshop at Harvard in May 2011 on Data Citation Principles <http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/datacitation_workshop/pages/welcome>.
Later the same year, the UK Digital Curation Centre published a guide to citing data <http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/data-citation-and-linking> in 2011.
The CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices <http://www.codata.org/taskgroups/TGdatacitation/index.html> (co-chaired by Christine Borgman (replacing Bonnie Carroll as Co-chair in January of this year), Jan Brase and Sara Callaghan) has been in existence since 2010.
In collaboration with the US National CODATA Committee and the Board on Research Data and Information<http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/brdi/index.htm>, a major workshop was organised in August 2011<http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/brdi/PGA_064019>, which was reported in ‘For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards’<http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=13564>
The CODATA-ICSTI Task Group then started work on a report covering data citation principles, eventually entitled ‘Out of Cite, Out of Mind’ <https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dsj/12/0/12_OSOM13-043/_article>– drafts were circulated for comment in April 2013 and the final report was released in September 2013.
Following the first ‘Beyond the PDF’ Meeting <https://sites.google.com/site/beyondthepdf/> in Jan 2011 participants produced the Force11 Manifesto ‘Improving Future Research Communication and e-Scholarship’ <http://www.force11.org/white_paper> which places considerable weight on the availability of research data and the citation of those data in the literature. At ‘Beyond the PDF II’ <http://www.force11.org/beyondthepdf2> in Amsterdam, March 2013, a group comprising Mercè Crosas, Todd Carpenter, David Shotton and Christine Borgman produced ‘The Amsterdam Manifesto on Data Citation Principles’. <http://www.force11.org/AmsterdamManifesto> In the very same week, in Gothenburg, an RDA Birds of a Feather group <http://forum.rd-alliance.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=58> was discussing the more specific problem of how to support, technologically, the reliable and efficient citation of dynamically changing or growing datasets and subsets thereof. And the broader issues of the place of data and research publication were being considered in the ICSU World Data Service Working Group on Data Publication<http://www.icsu-wds.org/working-groups/data-publication>. This group has, in turn, formed the basis for an RDA Interest Group<https://rd-alliance.org/internal-groups/publishing-data-ig.html>.
From June 2013, as the Force11 Group was preparing its website and activities to take forward the work on the Amsterdam Manifesto, calls came in from a number of sources for these various groups and initiatives to coordinate and collaborate. This was admirably well-received and from July the ‘Data Citation Synthesis Group’ had come into being with an agreed mission statement <http://www.force11.org/node/4381>:
The data citation synthesis group is a cross-team committee leveraging the perspectives from the various existing initiatives working on data citation to produce a consolidated set of data citation principles (based on the Amsterdam Manifesto, the CODATA and other sets of principles provided by others) in order to encourage broad adoption of a consistent policy for data citation across disciplines and venues. The synthesis group will review existing efforts and make a set of recommendations that will be put up for endorsement by the organizations represented by this synthesis group.
The synthesis group will produce a set of principles, illustrated with working examples, and a plan for dissemination and distribution. This group will not be producing detailed specifications for implementation, nor focus on technologies or tools.
As has been noted elsewhere , the group comprised 40 individuals and brought together a large number of organisations and initiatives <http://www.force11.org/node/4785>.
What followed over the summer was a set of weekly calls to discuss and align the principles. I must say, I thought these were admirably organised and benefitted considerably from participants’ efforts to prepare documents comparing the various groups’ statements. The face-to-face meeting of the group, in which a lot of detailed discussion to finalise the draft was undertaken, was hosted (with a funding contribution from CODATA) at the US National Academies of Science between the 2nd RDA Plenary <https://rd-alliance.org/programme.html> and the DataCite Summer Meeting <http://www.datacite.org/node/84> (which CODATA also co-sponsored). It has been intellectually stimulating and a real pleasure to contribute to these discussions and to witness so many informed and engaged people bashing out these issues.
The principles developed by the Synthesis Group are now open for comment and I urge as many people, researchers, editors and publishers as possible who believe that data has a place in scholarly communications to comment on them and, in due course, to endorse them and put them into practice.
Are we finally at the cusp of real change in practice? Will we now start seeing the practice of citing data sources become more and more widespread?
It’s soon to say for sure, but I hope these principles, and the work on which they build, have got us to a stage where we can start really believing the change is well underway.