The GMR Office coordinates the Emergency Preparedness program and monitors disasters in the region. Activities are outlined in the report below; this includes the webpage, confirming state Emergency Preparedness coordinators, training, and responses to the Flint water supply concerns and zika. (more…)
Archive for the ‘General’ Category
Includes events on precision medicine (from IOM) and lead and the public health (APHA). Highlights news and resources about journals, what librarians can do, a behavioral health resources and an index on child well-being. (more…)
The following resources were suggested by SPARC, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (more…)
In the news
- New York Times. 2/8/16. Scientists Investigate How Viruses Like Zika Cause Birth Defects.
- Washington Post. 2/12/16. NIH officials accelerate timeline for human trials of Zika vaccine, saying they will now begin in the summer.
Useful links (more…)
The good news is all the useful stuff is still there, now easier to find!
The National Network of Libraries of Medicine has been finishing its web site migration to the Drupal platform over the past year. The GMR site (part of the NNLM.gov domain) was migrated at the end of April, 2015. Since then we have gradually been tweaking it to replace functionality that was lost in the migration and to make our site easier and more intuitive to use. You may have noticed some of the bigger changes, such as the new Materials Order Form (https://nnlm.gov/gmr/outreach/exhibiting/materials-order-form) and the slide show on the front page. We have also been doing some consolidation, shifting, and renaming. So, for example, if you’re looking for materials for library advocacy, you’ll find them now under Member Services/Library Advocacy instead of Member Services/Promoting Your Library. We’ve also been experimenting with the menus, adding popup tool tips on some for clarity.
One of the biggest changes this year has been in the Training and Education section of our site. Lake Effects and Tech Talks now reside under the GMR Offerings, which replaced “GMR Classes” and has been reorganized with a more task oriented focus. Along the same lines, the Educational Resources page has been reorganized and renamed Guides and Tutorials. Take a spin around the evolving site! We hope you like the changes.
How can libraries play a role in transforming cities? Colleagues at the Lexington Public Library and Indiana University Northwest’s Anderson Library provided answers to this question in the form of a proposal to the Knight Cities Challenge. In its second year, the Knight Cities Challenge asks organizations to outline ways to transform communities. GMR cities in the challenge include: Akron OH, Detroit MI, Duluth MN, Ft. Wayne IN, Gary IN, Grand Forks ND, Lexington KY, and St. Paul MN. (more…)
As many of you know, the GMR has a Regional Advisory Council (RAC) to provide guidance in developing and evaluating programs and services that meet the needs of the region. This council is made up of state representatives, five resource library directors, and members who represent a hospital/nursing college library, a non-medical academic library, and community organizations. Beginning last summer, we’ve had some changes in our RAC membership. (more…)
Whether you are applying this time for a Technology Improvement Award (Reminder: deadline is October 15!), or considering applying in the future, you may find this checklist helpful.
10 Things to Keep in Mind When Applying for a TIA From the GMR
Are you a member or affiliate member? Check here: http://nnlm.gov/members/adv.html
Enter your library or institution name, leave the Membership Level and Library Type blank (so it will search “All”) and click the search button. If your institution doesn’t show up, try a new advanced search (click the link on the left side of the page) using the location (try just city and state).
If your library/institution is listed: click on the details link and look at the URL in the browser address bar; your LIBID will be at the end of the URL
If your library/institution is not listed: Go to the GMR Membership page (http://nnlm.gov/gmr/member-services/join) to see how to apply. There is a link to our handy online application form at the bottom of the page.
Questions 10 to 17 on the application form are the narrative section of the application. Note that the summary statement requested in Question 10 should be an “executive summary” or “elevator speech” type of statement (a 200 word limit is recommended). Details should be provided in the rest of the questions. Also note Question 17 (“Additional Comments”) can be used for details rather than putting everything in Question 10.
In question 13, provide the details of what equipment you will purchase. This should be a narrative, not a detailed list (that comes in question 18 –but make sure the details in the narrative match the details in question 18!)
Before you answer this question, however, make sure your IT department, Institutional Purchasing department, and any other department that will be involved are all on board with your selection. It is always a good idea to include, under the “how it was chosen” section, a note about your institution’s requirements and how you are complying with them.
If your institution’s IT or purchasing departments have issues with Apple products that you are requesting (which you would probably learn about by involving them in this process), note here how you will handle that.
Question 14 is important: you will need to measure outcomes and report on them once the project is completed. Make sure measureable outcomes are part of the process from the beginning.
Try to be realistic in the schedule for Question 15. Things can change, but if you have everything ready ahead of time (especially understanding any hoops you will face at your institution), you should be able to give a reasonably accurate time line. Important: projects awarded under this CFA must be finished by April 30, 2016!
Note in Question 16 that resumes or CVs will be needed for all key personnel listed. Consider working directly with your IT department and listing them as key personnel as well.
Question 17 is for all the details and narrative that you wanted to include in the summary (Question 10). Make use of the space here!
Question 18: the equipment details. Note that “brief narrative justification” here means just that. The fuller justification should be in Question 13.
Note subsection “b” requirements for any piece of equipment over $3000, and subsection “c” requiring documentation if your institution uses a single vendor or sole source.
Check (and double check!). Do you have:
- A complete application, all questions filled in?
- A reasonably accurate timeline?
- All key personnel listed (including IT people)?
- All required equipment listed (including extra software)?
- Resumes or CVs?
- Letters of support from all stakeholders?
- Equipment pricing documentation?
Submit it! firstname.lastname@example.org
First of all, many thanks goes to the National Network of Libraries of Medicine/ Greater Midwest Region (NNLM/GMR) for providing the Professional Development Award. With this award I was able to attend the WI Health Literacy Summit on April 14 – 15, 2015 as an attendee and a poster presenter to present our work. The overall experience was very rewarding. Conferences like this are good for networking (meeting new professionals and also those whom you already know). And conferences like this are also good for getting new ideas and understanding what is becoming ‘hot’ on your topic. Sometimes it’s also good for confirming things that you already know. Take for example, I attended the “Understanding Adults as Learners: Implications for Fostering Health Literacy” workshop and data from the workshop also supported what we’ve learned from very own project. The data said, “people are more likely to listen to the people they put the most credibility on”. Therefore understanding where people obtain information that is most credible to them can inform planning and development of any health-related programs. In another workshop, the data that was provided also confirmed our findings that “the lower the literacy level, the more likely the person will have poor health”.
Not only was it rewarding to attend workshops, but having an opportunity to present my work was also a very rewarding experience. What really gets me excited about poster presentations is that I get to share my knowledge with other professionals who are just as excited about health literacy as I am. This was my first poster presentation ever, so I can say that it wasn’t as scary as I thought. Presenting a poster is not nearly as nerve-wracking as an oral presentation. Most interactions are with a few people at a time and it’s more conversational in style than when you are standing before a group presenting.
This event was definitely a great experience for me. I saw several different ways in which researchers can organize and present their research. There were many interesting presentations of work and research going on about health literacy. And of course, I benefited from learning how to present my poster and handle sometimes-difficult questions and make connections with future potential project partners.